Home > Internal Compiler > Internal Compiler Error In Find_reloads

Internal Compiler Error In Find_reloads

uhm, cant help in this case either :/ i've once fiddled with that kind of stuff, but i've never really done an entire gcc port .... Pick two." "Read a lot. Compiling: main.c avr-gcc -c -mmcu=atmega64 -I. -gdwarf-2 -DF_CPU=14760300UL -DMEDIA=\"MMC\" -Os -funsigned-char -funsigned-bitfields -fpack-struct -fshort-enums -save-temps -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wa,-adhlns=main.lst -std=gnu99 -MD -MP -MF .dep/main.o.d main.c -o main.o main.c: In function 'main': main.c:699:1: Apr 25, 2004 Posts: 3951 View posts Location: Denmark #1 Posted by Bingo600: Thu. check my blog

spaces stripped out. the latest is for a compiler version that is old. :) and I already have a port, I'm just not sure it works properly for all source code. Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help | NewAccount | Log In Remember [x] | It appears that for certain combinations of array allocations, conditionals and loops, gfortran 4.6 and 4.7 give : "internal compiler error: in find_reloads, at reload.c:4067", but only when paired with -O3 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875

Cheap. uhm, cant help in this case either :/ i've once fiddled with that kind of stuff, but i've never really done an entire gcc port .... after someone else updated it > to work with 2.95.

if you dont want to dig into all that, try to disable all optimizations, and some other "smart" stuff....maybe it compiles then :) gpz Re: [Contiki-developers] any port using gcc? gnu ! Unfortunately, > no one who knows how to write one has worked on it in around 7 years... > I just updated it to work with gcc 3.1... Change alternative 1 to "x,m,1".

Patch was bootstrapped and regresion tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{,-m32} with --with-fpmath=avx configure option. Joly (In reply to comment #3) > The issue is related with "-mavx" > > I use "gfortran -O3 -mavx" to reproduce the problem. Details Message ID [email protected]om State New Headers show Return-Path: X-Original-To: [email protected] Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D81DB1007D3 for ; Fri, 28 Oct his comment is here No, thanks OSDir.com ubuntu-bugs Subject: [Bug 926147] [NEW] internal compiler error infind_reloads Date Index Thread: Prev Thread Index Public bug reported: System: Ubuntu 11.10 Hardware: 64 bit intel Compiler:

Unfortunately, > no one who knows how to write one has worked on it in around 7 years... > I just updated it to work with gcc 3.1... Sep 19, 2014 - 05:09 AM Log in / register to post comments Top clawson Level: Moderator Joined: Mon. So I guess one could use a binary split technique there to find out what it is in main() that the compiler does not like. I don't know if the target part of the dg-options is required.

Comment 6 Uroš Bizjak 2011-10-26 22:52:50 UTC Following (untested) patch fixes the failure for me: Index: sse.md =================================================================== --- sse.md (revision 180528) +++ sse.md (working copy) @@ -4231,12 +4231,11 @@ [(set Add tags Tag help Allen.McIntosh (mcintosh) wrote on 2012-02-03: #1 The Lapack source filt that triggers the error Edit (7.4 KiB, text/plain) Matthias Klose (doko) wrote on 2012-02-23: #2 works with what target are you using > and what kind of errors do you get? Hehe...

I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time. click site Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941608/+attachment/2786065/+files/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment removed: "Disassembly.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941608/+attachment/2786067/+files/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment removed: "ProcMaps.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941608/+attachment/2786071/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment removed: "ProcStatus.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941608/+attachment/2786072/+files/ProcStatus.txt ** after someone else updated it > to work with 2.95. Reproduce by: This version of zlaein.f (attached) is from Lapack 3.3.0 (attached) It's not clear why you folks didn't find this problem when building 11.10, except perhaps that I may have

  1. Propagate phi argument for phis with a single - argument. + SSA_NAME_VAR of vuse1 or vuse2, and use var.
  2. testsuitee/ChangeLog: PR target/50875 * gfortran.dg/pr50875.f90: New test.
  3. Please don't fill out this field.
  4. Please don't fill out this field.

Please refer to our Privacy Policy or Contact Us for more details You seem to have CSS turned off. Great! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926148 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/926148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u[email protected] news Oct 31, 2014 - 06:30 PM 12345Total votes: 0 Well i had to try if the bug still exists with 4.9.2 , and it does 1-avr_complex $ make -------- begin

Good. pr48757.f) define dg directives as: ! { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } ! { dg-options "-O3 -mavx" } This way, we won't annoy other innocent targets ;) NB.

The output of this when compiled against the earlier versions is: (-6.6689347635125245, -3.4315183934768561) (-0.21071909368227187,-0.21353560926074711) (-2.3118973846843422, -1.1895930430719770) (-3.7929436862808936,-3.8436409666934486).

Use phi result as phi arg in case vuse1 or vuse2 is NULL_TREE. - Replace uses of vuse1 if vuse2 is NULL_TREE. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. Handle case that def_stmt2 - is NULL. Only call calculate_dominance_info once.

Tried compiling against 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 20111010 (experimental) [trunk revision 179769]. Remove call to free_dominance_info. lovely, ain't it? More about the author From: James Dessart - 2003-12-30 14:57:37 Are any of the 8-bit ports using gcc, other than the CoCo one?

Sep 18, 2014 - 07:24 PM Fivestar widget 12345Total votes: 0 My post belongs to "no forum" , but is still reachable. I was hoping someone had had experience with porting gcc to new architectures. On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:06:09PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> >> I would kindly ask someone Use HARD_REGISTER_P.

Replace uses of vuse1 if vuse2 is NULL_TREE. it's bailing out in ctk-conio.c, at variable places, depending on whether I use -fomit-frame-pointer or not. it's bailing out in > ctk-conio.c, at variable places, depending on whether I use > -fomit-frame-pointer or not. > > James i've compiled the GBA and GP32 version using gcc with Affecting: gcc-4.6 (Ubuntu) Filed here by: Allen.McIntosh When: 2012-02-03 Confirmed: 2012-02-23 Started work: 2012-02-23 Completed: 2012-02-23 Target Distribution Baltix BOSS Juju Charms Collection Elbuntu Guadalinex Guadalinex Edu Kiwi Linux nUbuntu PLD

I was hoping someone had > had experience with porting gcc to new architectures. Call release_last_vdef, - same_succ_flush_bb, delete_basic_block. Jul 17, 2012 Posts: 8062 View posts Location: Location, Location #3 Posted by joeymorin: Fri. From: Groepaz - 2003-12-30 15:22:26 On Tuesday 30 December 2003 16:10, James Dessart wrote: > On 30-Dec-03, at 10:13 AM, Groepaz wrote: > > i've compiled the GBA and GP32

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter: I agree to receive quotes, newsletters and other information from sourceforge.net and its partners regarding IT services and products. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #940284, so is being marked as such. Description Joly Aarons 2011-10-26 15:43:09 UTC Created attachment 25618 [details] Stripped down test case. Call + release_last_vdef, same_succ_flush_bb, delete_basic_block.

When this happens specify an extra cost of 2. - (*movsi_insn): Rename to have "_novis3" suffix and add !VIS3 - guard. + (*movsi_insn): Rename to have "_novis3" suffix and add !VIS3 GBiz is too! Latest News Stories: Docker 1.0Heartbleed Redux: Another Gaping Wound in Web Encryption UncoveredThe Next Circle of Hell: Unpatchable SystemsGit 2.0.0 ReleasedThe Linux Foundation Announces Core Infrastructure the target is m6809, and the machine description used to build > the compiler may not be complete... James SourceForge About Site Status @sfnet_ops Powered by Apache Allura™ Find and Develop Software Create a Project Software Directory Top Downloaded Projects Community Blog @sourceforge Resources Help Site Documentation Support Request

the target is m6809, and the machine description used to build the compiler may not be complete... I'm > having a bit of trouble with my version of gcc... I've written out to the gcc list, in the hopes that someone will be able to help me.