Home > Internal Compiler > Internal Compiler Error Segmentation Violation Signal Raised

Internal Compiler Error Segmentation Violation Signal Raised

Andre 0 0 03/05/14--17:57: having trouble running generic linked list program Contact us about this article I have a small test program which creates a generic linked list.   It compiles, but If anybody has a chance to try Intel 16 please let us know the outcome. Although I can now compile and build successfully, is this the right way to go? -- Thank you Yours sincerely, TAY wee-beng -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... Is there anything that I am missing here? have a peek at these guys

The target platform has been defaulted to "not set".  I tried x86 as the target but no change. Top Back to original post Leave a Comment Please sign in to add a comment. The NAG options in question are: -nocheck_modtime : don't complain if .mod files appear out of date Does ifort even check the modification time of .mod files? Each thread produces just 3 integers as its final result and these are stored in an array howmany(15). (The first 3 elements of howmany() hold other data.) I have written the

enddo end program d_15002 > ifort -vec-report2 -c d_15002.f90                   (ifort /Qvec-report:2 /c d_15002.f90  on Windows*) d_15002.f90(8): (col. 3) remark: LOOP WAS VECTORIZED Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. The above message indicates that the loop was successfully vectorized using packed SIMD instructions.  Example: program d_15002 implicit none integer, parameter :: n=100 real, dimension(n) :: x = (/(i, i=1,n)/) integer I have downloaded the trial version of 11.1 to give my idea a try before buying it.

When using DVF to compile the code, I can open the main program directly (double left clicks) and add subroutine before I build them up and run the code. I can not attach the program ("you are not authorized to open this page"), so I copy it below. What do I miss? Dave 0 0 03/07/14--19:29: Fortran DLL Compiled on Win7 called by VB6 fails on XP Contact us about this article Hi all, I have a fortran dll compiled for Win32 with

When I compiled the code with IVF, however, I got two problems: 1) How to compile fortran code without project? If I write         do i= 1,n-inc,inc           a(i)= a(i+inc)+b(i)           enddo ifort decides not to vectorize with /QxAVX2.  Apparently, that's a Linux x86_64 i486 i586 i686, ifort compiler with icc (dmpar) > ------------------------ > > Intel Compiler Version: > ------------------------ > Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler XE for applications running on > https://github.com/andreww/fox/issues/32 This should be much faster than producing an object file, right? -nomod : don't produce .mod file I can't seem to find any equivalent options, although one could be clever and

My system is RHEL 5.10 x86_64. How many cores to use?            i = omp_get_max_threads()       NumThreads = min0(4, i)         if(len <= 50) NumThreads = 1 ! <= 50 not worth the overheads       call Explicit declarations       IMPLICIT NONE           !.. In the end, I realised that it is due to using *petsc.h90*: module PETSc_solvers use set_matrix ...

There is a link to KERNEL32.dll, despite setting the FORTRAN>library>runtime  option to multithread. http://openmp.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1240 Argument list          CLASS(MyIntProp), INTENT(OUT) :: This          CLASS(*), INTENT(IN)          :: Value                 !.. Skip to content Advanced search Board index Change font size FAQ Register Login Information The requested topic does not exist. I have also verified the contents of a(j) and b(j) are exactly the same.

Note: File and line given may not be explicit cause of this error. More about the author Board index The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group Ocean There was no error when I built it up. At that same time the error was also fixed for 15.0 compiler in the most recent Intel Parallel Studio XE 2015 release.

  • Board index The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ] Powered by phpBB Forum Software © phpBB Group [Q-e-developers] Compilation problems
  • Because the packed instructions operate on more than one data element at a time, the loop can execute more efficiently.
  • Any insights to the above issue?
  • That may also be something you found in creating the reproducer.
  • The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee.

Unfortunately this is also still reproducible in our upcoming Composer XE SP1 Update 1. I just hit two compiler issues using Intel ifort 16.0.1 20151021 First, /tmp/ifort446fIY.i90: catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation violation signal raised** Please report this error along with the circumstances in I can run the code, but it cannot run correctly (dispersed abnormally which didn't occur when compiling the code with DVF). http://mttags.com/internal-compiler/internal-compiler-error-segmentation-fault-gcc.php This error disappears with -O2 The compilation instructions is /share/apps/intel/composer_xe_2013_sp1.2.144/bin/intel64/ifort -i8 -r8 -pc64 -auto -vec-report0 -warn nousage -cxxlib fort version: Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler XE for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 14.0.2.144

I've tried it on both ifort and gfortran with the same errors. I have searched in the mkl manual and in the help, but I didn't succeed to find such function. Intel Compiler Version: Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler XE for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 14.0.2.144 Build 20140120 Copyright (C) 1985-2014 Intel Corporation.  All rights reserved.

When I directly open the main.f90 with IVF, the function of "build up" become not available.Moreover, I cannot find the button to add the file to the main program.

Thanks, Sebastien tmp> ifort -V Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler XE for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 14.0.0.080 Build 20130728 Copyright (C) 1985-2013 Intel Corporation.  All rights reserved. 30 DAY Visit: Need help setting up or configuring the WRF? For the small reproducer, the error does not occur with use gtv_protocol inside the interface vs. Set value of integer type       PURE ELEMENTAL SUBROUTINE SetInt(This, Value)              !..

Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. You signed out in another tab or window. Dmitry N. http://mttags.com/internal-compiler/internal-compiler-error-segmentation-fault-11.php After searching on the internet about my problem I got the impression that trial licenses lack 3rd party integration feature.

Mon, 09/15/2014 - 08:12 Thanks for the feedback. use gtvdef_variables. end module my_interfaces ! I reproduce all the necessary details.

An internal compiler error is by definition a compiler bug and it is probably worth reporting this to Intel. Now the parallel code       if(NumThreads == 1) then       ! Since I cannot run the code on IVF with directly open the code without project, I created a project for the code. All rights reserved. > FOR NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY > ------------------------ > > All prerequisite software is built with Intel compiler: > ------------------------ > - netcdf-4.3.1.1 > - mpich-3.1 > - jasper-1.900.1

Get value of integer type       PURE ELEMENTAL SUBROUTINE GetInt(Value, This)              !.. How to compile the code without out project? 2) Cannot compile fortran code in a project. I have attached the code. And, Please post the link where i can get the evaluation version of the same.   0 0 03/07/14--01:46: Advice on OpenMP code please Contact us about this article I am

bytes between the common and the variable we want to equivalence.   ! If I use : *#include "finclude/petsc.h" or * *#include "finclude/petscdmda.h90"* *#include "finclude/petscksp.h90"* Then there is no problem. When using IVF, however, I cannot run the code in the way I used with DVF. Looking for data to run the WRF?

The values of the list are pointers to unlimited polymorphic variables. Can you tell me what I'm doing wrong?